A few hours ago, following the announcement of the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare, Patrick Gaspard the Executive Director of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) tweeted his reaction to the Supreme Court's decision to uphold Obamacare. He deleted his original tweet which included graphic language where he referred to all that opposed Obamacare as "motherf*ckers." He deleted that tweet, but The Blaze snapped a screen shot of it before he was able to remove it.
Credit: TheBlaze.com
Instead, he opted for the evidently much-preferred-by-the-DNC word "Bitches." This tweet remains on his Twitter feed at the time of this post.
You should also note that at the time I took the screen shot above 1,507 people had retweeted that tweet and 326 had "favorited" it.
If it was wrong for Rush Limbaugh, a radio talk-show host, to refer to Sandra Fluke as a "slut," why is it not wrong for the DNC Executive Director to not only use the word "motherf*ckers," but to also use the word "Bitches" to describe approximately 60% of the American public who oppose Obamacare?
He also posted the tweet below where he shed the persona of a typical, vile Democrat by pretending to actually care about the American people (another Democrat ruse). What he did not do is apologize. Nor has he removed the word "Bitches" from his wall.
What a bitch.
Don't mind my one usage of the one bad word toward Patrick. If you want to see why I feel justified in my behavior, take a look at what Sarah Palin has been dealing with today from the left on her Twitter feed where the darlings on the left have been referring to her "slut" daughters and her "retard" son after she tweeted about the Obamacare decision:
See? My calling Patrick Gaspard a bitch, is nothing. We're not even close to being even. But, since this is a game played by the left, I'm done.
However, as a woman, I don't appreciate the seeming acceptance of Gaspard's usage of the word "Bitches" by the DNC. But, since he's a Democrat and hypocrisy runs amok on the left, I don't really expect an apology. This is the type of behavior that I've come to expect from the hypocritical left. They are guilty of everything they accuse others of being. Everything. The real "war on women" is alive and well at the DNC. Gaspard's ignorant post on Twitter proves it.
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks!Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
The latest Obama campaign email (words in bold and parentheses are mine):
Shelly --
If we're drastically outspent in this election, there's a very good chance we will lose to Mitt Romney.
This is a distinct possibility. The financial landscape in this race has changed over the last few weeks.
What concerns me is the Obama supporters I've encountered who don't understand that this is what we're facing. (How many "Obama supporters" have they met? I find them ALL to be this stupid.)
The fundraising deadline this week is a test: Are we going to allow the other side to dominate us, or are we going to prove that elections are decided by everyday Americans pitching in what they can? (You don't need to eat; send us your money.)
Ready to fight? Please donate $3 or more today, ahead of the FEC deadline. (So it doesn't appear as though we are getting our asses handed to us in fundraising. Hurry!)
What's at stake here goes beyond the progress we've made so far, or anything the President wants to do in a second term. (I shudder at the thought of a "second term" for Obama. Ugh.)
What's at stake is the very idea that regular people should still be in control of elections in this country. (How are those who can't afford a simple ID supposed to "chip-in" anything to your campaign? They're already voting for you - what more do you want from them? Racists.)
Barack Obama proved in 2008 that millions of people giving $10, $20, or $50 at a time are an undeniable force. Today, our campaign is bigger and faster. We're opening more offices and recruiting more volunteers to knock on doors. (Read: The level of voter intimidation, unchecked voter fraud, dead people voting, lawyering, and corruption in which we are engaged is unmatched in U.S. history, even by us.)
If we allow the spending disadvantage to get beyond a certain point, none of that will matter. Mitt Romney will win, and it will be because we couldn't keep up. (Give us what little pocket "change" you may have left after 3 and 1/2 years of Obama's policies.)
We can't let that happen. I'm proud of how we're building this campaign, and I'm not about to let a handful of billionaires prove us wrong. (Because we all know that it's always 5 or less rich, white guys that buy every election.)
Donate $3 or more today:
https://donate.barackobama.com/June-Deadline
Thanks,
Julianna
Julianna Smoot
Deputy Campaign Manager
Obama for America
P.S. -- Today, any donation you make here automatically enters you to join President Obama on the trail next week. We're saving two seats on the campaign bus, right next to the President -- one for you, one for your guest. (And they'll call the recipient of this "prize" a "winner.")
Go figure.
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks!Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
This guy is hard. His vlogs are not for the weak. He's too honest for the weak. I'm not claiming to be "strong" (as opposed to "weak"), I'm simply saying that if you don't like controversial things, you most likely will have a very hard time listening to him. I find him interesting/intriguing and this video (I include "this video" and a partial transcript at the bottom of this post) of his probably pretty accurately describes why I am. Although, I don't fear being called a racist. I'm used to it. I'm not a racist but I've been called one so many times by those on the left that get so frustrated with me that they have no other come-back than to call me names. That's fine. Whatever.
Onto his calling-out of the Obamas. If you are not able to listen to the entire video, maybe you read faster than he speaks, I've transcribed his entire video below. I'm not going to dissect his words. He's very clear.
If you're offended by a black man using the word "negro" please don't listen to this video or read the transcript I've compiled which is beneath this video:
If you'd like to follow "5723Michael" on Twitter, you can do so HERE.
You can subscribe to his YouTube channel HERE.
He also has a blog - but because of Google's insane "censoring" practices, I'm not going to link to it for fear of having my own blog restricted, as his is. (His blog has a "content warning" on it. The truth is such an awful thing, you know.) You can find the link to his blog on his Twitter account.
TRANSCRIPT
When one considers the social condition of black women and according to recent statistics 70% are single, it is important to note that within this troubling number they are not speaking of women who have dropped out of high school. They are not talking about black women who are on welfare. They are not talking about black women who have had multiple children with different men. When this number is discussed, this 70% of black women who are currently single, they're speaking of professional black women. Women who have gone out and have attained everything that society said she would need to make her an eligible candidate for committed long-term relationships and ultimately marriage.
Consider these facts: She has a college degree. She owns her own home. She has her own automobile. She makes her own money. But in light of these social trappings 70% of professional black women find themselves single or in dead-end relationships with "down-low" homosexuals, petty drug dealers, or married pastors, and the questions bears, "why?"
Now when I offer my critique as to why this is, many people have labelled me a misogynist. I've heard rumblings of "he prefers white women" or "he hates black people." This is understood. But yet, the facts cannot be denied nor can they be refuted that your average black female in 2012, be she professional or not, is emotionally unstable, spiritually barren, politically uncouth. And this is most troubling when you view black women and how, because of their social behavior, they have breathed fresh life into age-old stereotypes, not only concerning the black female sexuality, but her personality and how she deals in interpersonal relationships.
Because of her actions, she has rendered these stereotypes facts. No one can refute this. 70% of these sisters being single is most troubling. And it becomes even more troubling when one considers that you have a black female sitting in the White House who has remained deathly silent concerning the social plight of black women in this nation.
Michelle Obama has raised her voice and said nothing concerning the ongoing downward spiral of professional black women and black women in general. She has said nothing about the 'Nicki Minaj' and the other entertainers who promote and peddle cultural filth. She raises her voice and says nothing about women who are half-dressed and gallivant on the world stage breathing fresh life into age-old stereotypes about black females and their sexuality. This becomes compounded when you consider that Michelle Obama is raising two black girls. She remains silent on the conditions of black women and one would have to ask why. And upon further review, it became clear to me as to why Michelle Obama refuses to open her mouth and say one word in protest concerning the ongoing degradation of black females in this nation.
When you consider that it would be quite hypocritical for Miss Obama to raise her voice in opposition to the 'Nicki Minaj's' and the other women in the entertainment industry, who basically conduct themselves like sleazy prostitutes, it would be hard for her to offer up a sound, critical analysis of their behavior when her husband is flying around on Air Force One with Jay-Z, an ex-dope dealer who has come to national prominence rapping about selling dope to black people, destroying black lives and black families. Yet this is who Mr. Obama gallivants around with and flies on Air Force One and plays basketball on the south lawn with and allows to hold fundraisers for him. And even though this is quite dysfunctional, the American negro, when you approach the American negro and you ask them, why is it that you don't see anything wrong with Michelle Obama remaining silent about the downward condition of black women, it is black women themselves who will defend Miss Obama. It is black women who will say, "well, she wasn't elected," and "it's not her place," and this is what they will say. Likewise, when you ask the American negro about Mr. Obama and how he has remained utterly silent about how black men conduct themselves in public like social buffoons, dressing like circus clowns, he remains silent on these issues. And, again it is the negro who gives him a pass.
Yet and still when Mr. Bush, a white man, did not act fast enough, according to the negroes during hurricane Katrina, he was immediately labeled as one who didn't care about black people. In that same election year, when asked, then Vice President Dick Cheney, about (the) AIDS epidemic in black females and he responded "I didn't know there was an epidemic," immediately Mr. Cheney was labelled as one who didn't care about the plight of black women in America. But they remain silent when you have Barack Obama (and) Michelle Obama who open their voice and say nothing concerning the degradation of not only black women, and black men, and how they themselves are the ones who are breathing fresh life into the stereotypes. And the reason why they give them a pass is because they're black. And that in and of itself demonstrates just how dysfunctional this 'American negro' has become.
He is no different than his ancestors. Well, let me correct that. Actually, he's worse than his ancestors because at least his ancestors knew that they were slaves. This modern day negro, because he has allowed himself to be duped and because he has allowed himself to sip from the crack cup of political propaganda being served by his liberal slave masters of the DNC, he somehow believes that he is no longer a slave. But I would offer the analysis that he is a slave nonetheless. He is in worse condition than his ancestors because he actually thinks he is mentally free. When in all actuality, he is every bit the buck-dancing, bojangling slave who still votes for the party, a political party, that sought to maintain slavery and to keep his black ass in chains.
So when you consider the fact that 70% of black women are single; 70% of professional black women are single, even though you have a black female sitting in the White House and she remains silent about the conditions of her fellow sisters, yet, it is black women themselves who give Miss Obama a pass, only goes to prove what I've been saying in all of these videos and that is that the American negro is regressing. He is not progressing in 2012."
END OF TRANSCRIPT
(Whew!)
The 2nd video (which I linked to at the beginning of this post) currently has embedding disabled so I can't include the video in this post as with the video above. If he changes this and I become aware of it, I'll post the video for you to view here (which still counts as a "view" on YouTube). For now, all I can do is post this link for the video - with the title: White Bigots, Obama, & the Negro race!
This is the partial transcription of the video for which I just gave you the link. This partial transcription begins at the 6:20 mark in that video:
If there is going to be a solution, if indeed, we are going to bridge the gap of racial tension in this nation then there has to be open and honest dialogue. White people are going to have to sit down and be able to openly speak their minds about their feelings of this 'American negro.' Likewise, the American negro must grow a set, must reduce his fear, and his love and begin to speak his mind of what he really truly feels about white people. Once this is done, we can map out a clear avenue of solution for all of the tension that exists. But, as long as these particular dialogues are held with buck-dancing, bojangling negroes who white people, who some white people, are quick to go ask "boy, what do you think about this racial tension," and because they are buck-dancing, bojangling, slave-minded negroes, they're gonna tell them, "well, boss I see it the way you see it."
Likewise, when the American negro wants to deal with racial tension and he goes to the likes of the "Al Charlatans" and the "Messy Jacksons" or the irrelevant NAACP or the outdated Urban League or he goes to the defunct, crazy-minded New Black Panther Party or some other Afro-centric buffoon and they're gonna say "well, you know everything that goes on in black America is the white man's fault." Everything from the fact that he doesn't clean his teeth right to the fact that he has uneven sidewalks in his community can be blamed on the ongoing legacy of racism and slavery. "It's the white man's fault."
When you have the negro listening to that insane position and you have white people garnering their positions from their slave-minded, buffoonish negroes, then the dialogue can never take place. There must be an open and honest, clear-cut decision where everyone sits down and speaks their mind. Regardless to who it offends. Regardless to who likes it or who don't.
END OF PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT.
Again, if you'd like to follow "5723Michael" on Twitter, you can do so HERE.
You can subscribe to his YouTube channel HERE.
He also has a blog - but because of Google's insane "censoring" practices, I'm not going to link to it for fear of having my own blog restricted, as his is. (His blog has a "content warning" on it. The truth is such an awful thing, you know.) You can find the link to his blog on his Twitter account.
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks! Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
Dambisa Moyo an economist and author who was a guest on CNN's "Your Money" on Sunday suggested that the United States change it's entire political structure in order to fix the economy. We should be more like China. The President & Congress should serve longer terms to allow for more "long-term thinking" in regard to the economy. According to Miss Moyo, not doing so leads to "short-term" thinking which is the kind of thinking that doesn't allow for any long-term strategic planning in regard to the economy.
Oh, to be more like China.
These suggestions come at about the 2:20 mark in this video.
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks! Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
Last Friday night former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was the headline speaker at the RightOnline conference that was held in Las Vegas. During that speech she gave credit to Matt Drudge, creator of the Drudge Report, for being the original "citizen journalist." The person that broke the story of the "blue dress" in the Clinton/Lewinsky debacle was Matt Drudge. It is the story that put the Drudge Report on the map.
Governor Palin's mention of Matt Drudge is in the short clip below. If you'd like to view her entire speech from the RightOnline conference, you may do so HERE. Drudge's appearance at the National Press Club from 1998, which Governor Palin references in her speech, is also below.
June 2, 1998 - Matt Drudge appears before the National Press Club. The first 14 minutes of this video are of Matt delivering his speech. The remainder of the video is the Q & A session.
Want more Drudge? This is from November of 2007. No, he doesn't sit down for many interviews, darnit.
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks! Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
“Father’s Day 2012: Encouraging Men To Live, Love & Lead."
If more video becomes available...and I become aware of it...I'll update this post.
MORE:
Tim Tebow Surprises Stunned Father of Baby Izaiah Paralyzed by Teen Drunk Driver on Father's Day
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks! Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
Michelle Malkin gave 2 speeches at the RightOnline conference that concluded last night in Las Vegas.
Here is speech #1 from Friday night:
Here is speech #2 from Saturday morning:
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks! Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
Last night former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was the headline speaker at the RightOnline conference being held in Las Vegas. The conference continues through the weekend. Below is just one of the quotes from her speech. (The full speech is posted below.)
I transcribed the first video.
Sarah:
But, say for the sake of argument that they couldn't afford to do the job. They couldn't afford to send reporters to Chicago to research a candidate's record because they spent all their money in...Wasilla? At the Mocha Mouse, they were gonna find out what kind of coffee Bristol really ordered when she was seventeen.
(Laughter)
So, for the sake of argument, say they ran out of money. Why at least did they not read his autobiography? They have learned a whole lot (applause) and not just about all that poccalo smokin' and that cocaine snortin' and what he ate..."Fido!" I think it's funny that the cocktail circuit/circus gives me a hard time for eating elk and moose but, come on, there's a difference. Anybody here have a pet moose? There's a difference.
If you wish to be notified of my future blog posts, please subscribe to my blog via the “Follow by email” box near the top of this page. You will NOT be spammed. If I make 10 posts in one day, you’ll only receive ONE email. Thanks! Because the left owns the media in this country, I blog. If you don’t share these posts, who else will see them?
